Video

Communication Is Important When It Comes to Prostate Cancer

The Number of Home Births Has Gone Up

Which American Couples Are More Likely to Stay Together?

Workplace Wellness Can Help Reduce the Risk for Heart Problems

Some Parents May Hasten Death for Terminally Ill Children

Fitness Academics

Secondhand Smoke Increases Risk for Heart Disease in Kids

Toddlers Don't Learn Vocabulary From TV

Despite Worries, Most Parents Vaccinate Their Kids Anyway

Food Allergies Can Be Treated With the Allergen Foods

Signs of Heart Disease Could Be As Early as 3 in Obese Kids

The Number of Women Having Strokes is Rising

Preventative Mastectomy

Cases of Gestational Diabetes Are On the Rise

Nintendo Wii Could Be Therapy for Stroke Victims

Screening for Spinal Muscular Atrophy Not Cost-Effective: Study

Posted on 02/05/2010, 09:00
By -- Robert Preidt

But testing of high-risk couples could be viable, researchers say

FRIDAY, Feb. 5 (HealthDay News) -- It's not cost-effective to screen couples genetically to determine if they're at risk of having children with spinal muscular atrophy (SMA), says a U.S. study.

There is ongoing controversy about whether screening for SMA -- the most common genetic cause of infant death -- should be routinely offered to couples.

In this study, researchers created an analytical model to compare a policy of universal SMA screening to that of no screening. Baseline assumptions used in the model included a disease prevalence of 1 in 10,000 for a carrier rate of 1 in 50, 70 percent of affected children having severe disease.

The researchers also assumed a 90 percent sensitivity rate from carrier screening and that 2 percent of SMA cases arise from de novo mutations (genetic mutations not inherited from either parent).

The baseline cost estimates in 2009 dollars included $400 for a carrier screen and $260,000 for the lifetime cost of a child with severe disease. The researchers calculated maternal quality-adjusted-life-years assuming a 22 percent reduction in quality of life for having a child with severe SMA and 8 percent for fetal loss.

The researchers concluded that 11,000 women would have to be screened to prevent one case of SMA, at a cost of $4.7 million per case averted.

"Our findings show that screening everyone for SMA is not cost effective," study co-author Dr. Sarah Little, of Massachusetts General Hospital, said in a news release. "Our results, however, were most sensitive to changes in the baseline prevalence of disease, suggesting that prenatal SMA screening may be cost effective in high risk populations, such as those with a family history of disease."

The study was to be presented Friday at the annual meeting of the Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine in Chicago.

More information

The Muscular Dystrophy Association has more about spinal muscular atrophy.

SOURCE: Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine, news release, Feb. 5, 2010

More news in Women's Health...

BigHealthTree.com Disclaimer

Bighealthtree.com Does Not Provide Medical Advice. This site, including the above information, is for informational purposes only and is not a substitute for professional medical or health advice. Always seek the advice of your physician or a qualified health or medical professional before starting any new treatment, changing existing treatment, or altering your current exercise and/or diet program. If you think you are having a medical emergency, call 911 (or the emergency services in your area) or your doctor immediately.

Rating: 2.8 / 5 (59 votes)